God’s purpose of grace

God’s purpose of election is bound to be mysterious to men, for we cannot aspire to an understanding of the secret thoughts and decisions of the mind of God.  However, the doctrine of election is never introduced in Scripture either to arouse or to baffle our carnal curiosity, but always for a practical purpose.  On the one hand, it engenders deep humility and gratitude, for it excludes all boasting.  On the other, it brings both peace and assurance, for nothing can quieten our fears for our own stability like the knowledge that our safety depends ultimately not on ourselves but on God’s own purpose of grace.

From: Authentic Christianity 1995 John Stott and Timothy Dudley-Smith.


The mystery of election

“Many mysteries surround the doctrine of election, and theologians are unwise to systematize it in such a way that no puzzles, enigmas or loose ends are left. At the same time, in addition to the arguments developed in the exposition of Romans 8:28-30, we need to remember two truths.

First, election is not just a Pauline or apostolic doctrine; it was also taught by Jesus himself. “I know those I have chosen,’ he said. (Jn. 13:18).

Secondly, election is an indispensable foundation of Christian worship, in time and eternity. It is the essence of worship to say: ‘Not to us, O Lord, not to us, but to your name be the glory’ (Ps. 115:1). If we were responsible for our own salvation, either in whole or even in part, we would be justified in singing our own praises and blowing our own trumpet in heaven. But such a thing is inconceivable. God’s redeemed people will spend eternity worshipping him, humbling themselves before him in grateful adoration, ascribing their salvation to him and to the Lamb, and acknowledging that he alone is worthy to receive all praise, honour and glory. Why? Because our salvation is due entirely to his grace, will, initiative, wisdom and power.”

Quoted from Authentic Christianity 1995 John Stott and Timothy Dudley-Smith.

Lost in Translation

Lost In Translation

I have recently started using the NIV(2011) version in my preaching on Sundays, and a few people have asked me why I am doing this after using the ESV for 10 years, so I thought that I would take a moment to share a little of my reasoning. The short answer is that sometimes it is refreshing to have a change, but is not simply a matter of taste as I hope to briefly explain.

The starting point is the fact that the Bible was written in ancient languages: Hebrew for the Old Testament and Greek for the New Testament. As few of us are, or indeed ever will be, fluent users of these languages we need to have a translation into a language that we can read and understand. Translation however is an imprecise process and also involves a degree of interpretation. The Italians have a proverb which says ‘traduttore traditore’ meaning ‘the translator is a traitor’. There is inevitably loss when something is translated; the question is how much loss is acceptable.

Consider the simple English expression ‘My name is David’. If you were taught French at school you would have been taught to introduce yourself with the expression ‘Je m’appelle David’ and told that this means ‘my name is David’. However, if you simply replace the words with English this would become something like ‘I call myself David’. This would be understandable but not the way English people speak. A translator has to choose between formally following the wording and structure of the original language, and producing something that is more readily understood in the target language. Bible translators use three words to describe the priority of their translation.

  • Formal translation – aims to replace word for word, at times sacrificing good English style and using a more extended vocabulary. A formal translation is good for students of the bible with a wide vocabulary and a good understanding of the background of the Bible times. In short those who are prepared to work a bit to understand what the Bible says. (e.g. NASB, KJV, ESV, RSV)
  • Functional translation – aims to achieve a more understandable quality of English using more common vocabulary in the same way as the wider population. This sacrifices some of the nuances of meaning for the sake of readability and makes the text more understandable to a general reader. (e.g. NIV, TNIV, HCSB)
  • Free translation – places the highest priority on simplicity of English and vocabulary. The results are often very easy to understand but the reader may be more strongly influenced by a translator’s interpretation than they realise. These translations can be good for less confident readers, but are also popular for bringing a refreshing perspective on familiar scriptures for readers who normally use other translations. (e.g. GNB, NCV, NLT, The Message, Living Bible)

Note however that all translations involve interpretation, the question is how much are you prepared to accept? It would be easy to assume that the best or most accurate translation would be the one that is most formal. However if you then can’t understand the English that is of little benefit to you! This is compounded by the fact that every language changes and even over a period of a few years words can become outmoded, take on new meanings, or become loaded with vastly differing meaning. This means that we will always need newer translations to take account of these adaptations. The NIV was first developed in the 1970’s and has gone through a couple of revisions such as NIVI and TNIV. The latest revision is known as NIV(2011) because it was produced in 2011, and is one of the most readable and popular English translations available. I hope this will help me make my preaching clearer. If you use the NIV on the You Version Bible app or have bought a new NIV in the last two years then these will be NIV(2011).

Should you change version? That is really up to you! You will find it easier to follow what I am reading on Sunday mornings if you do, and the NIV(2011) is freely available on a smart phone or tablet. In the end, the best translation for you is one that you will read and understand. There is value in any of those listed above and I will continue to refer to them all in my study.

This blog post featured in the February 2014 edition of Lifelines


Noah Movie (2014)

The final weeks of 2013 and the beginning few of 2014 have seen the UK battered by wind and rain. It is painful to see the misery that the ensuing floods have brought to people on this Fair Isle. The old saying that an Englishman’s home is his castle goes out the window when water seeps through the door frame and up through the floorboards. My heart goes out to people who have been flooded out of their homes and seen the value wiped off property that in some cases is impossible to insure. The resigned stoicism and gallows humour of some of the victims when they have been interviewed by news reporters is a credit to human resilience yet in some ways only heightens our sympathy for their plight. I have heard more than one person suggest in jest that they might respond to the incessant rain by building an Ark in their back garden.

The story of Noah’s Ark and the great flood is one that is deep at the heart of our cultural heritage. I am intrigued to see how this biblical account will be portrayed in the Russell Crowe film ‘Noah’ which hits the big screens in March. It will also be interesting to see how audiences respond to this epic story. The trailer suggests that it will be far from the fluffy depiction favoured by children’s story books. The trailer also suggests that the film will not back away from the biblical perspective that the flood was a judgement from God in response to mankind’s rebellion against him.

Some people hold the view that wrath and judgement are purely an Old Testament manifestation of God and that in the New Testament we find an altogether gentler, loving side to his character that supersedes what went before. A more detailed reading of the Old and New Testaments reveals that God’s wrath and mercy are equally present in both. In the Old Testament, God’s love provided a way for Noah’s family to escape the apocalyptic destruction of the earth by flood through Noah’s Ark. In the New Testament, God’s love provides a way for us to escape the apocalyptic destruction of the earth by fire through the Cross of Christ. Noah’s neighbours mocked the faith that led to the building of the Ark, yet regretted it. Today there are many who would like to dismiss talk of a coming judgement day as a scaremongering myth – will they come to regret this? What about you?

This blog post featured in the February 2014 edition of Hook Focus